top of page

How Experienced Executives Manage Risk in Uncertain Markets

Sep 23
3 min read
Manage Risk in Uncertain Markets | John Jezzini

By the time a downturn makes headlines, the decisions that determine who survives it have usually already been made. Businesses rarely fail because of a downturn — they fail because of decisions made months or years earlier, when the risk was invisible and the market felt fine.


That's the real difference between reactive management and experienced leadership. Seasoned executives don't predict the next crisis correctly. They build businesses — and portfolios — that don't need a correct prediction to survive one. Managing risk in uncertain markets isn't about eliminating exposure. It's about deciding, in advance, which risks are worth taking.


Risk Isn't the Enemy in Uncertain Markets. Unmanaged Risk Is


There's a common misconception that experienced investors are simply more cautious. In practice, it's usually the opposite. What separates them isn't risk avoidance — it's risk intentionality. They take on risk deliberately, in places they understand, and build in room to absorb the risks they didn't see coming.


This matters because uncertainty isn't a temporary condition in markets — it's the default one. Executives who treat calm markets as the baseline get caught flat-footed when conditions change. Executives who treat uncertainty as the baseline build differently from the start.


Lesson One: Liquidity Is a Strategy, Not a Leftover


During the 2008 financial crisis, companies holding strong cash positions didn't just survive — many became buyers while distressed competitors were forced into fire sales. Liquidity held in calm periods is what allows an investor to act with confidence in difficult ones. It isn't dead weight on a balance sheet — it's optionality.


Lesson Two: Concentration Feels Efficient — Until It Isn't


Silicon Valley Bank's 2023 collapse is one of the clearest recent case studies in concentration risk. The Federal Reserve's own post-mortem found the bank had a highly concentrated business model and a reliance on uninsured deposits that left it acutely exposed to the specific combination of rising interest rates and slowing activity in the technology sector. The bank had grown from $71 billion to over $211 billion in assets in a short period, and deposit outflows exceeded $40 billion in a single day before regulators stepped in.


The lesson experienced executives take from this isn't "banks are risky." It's that concentration — of customers, of duration, of assumptions — quietly increases fragility even when every individual decision looked reasonable in isolation.


Lesson Three: Underwrite the Downside Before the Upside


Durable investors underwrite what a deal looks like if things go wrong before they get excited about what happens if things go right — stress-testing real estate against higher vacancy, structuring credit with collateral rather than relying purely on projections, sizing positions so being wrong is survivable rather than catastrophic.


This discipline is a large part of why private credit has become one of the fastest-growing allocations among family offices. Average private credit allocations rose from 3% to 4% of family office portfolios since 2023 — a 33% increase — while the share of family offices with no private credit exposure at all fell from 36% to 26%. Separately, nearly a third of family offices say they plan to increase their private credit allocations through 2025 and 2026, the highest figure of any alternative asset class surveyed. Structured with contractual interest payments and often collateral, private credit sits higher in the capital stack than equity — offering yields that compete with equity returns, with meaningfully more protection if conditions deteriorate.


Lesson Four: Time Horizon Changes What "Risk" Even Means


A short-term investor and a long-term investor can look at the same asset and reasonably disagree about how risky it is — because they're measuring against different clocks.


Because patient capital isn't managing to a quarterly redemption cycle, temporary volatility isn't automatically a threat — it can be an entry point, provided the fundamentals are sound.

The risk isn't gone. It's reframed. What looks dangerous over a two-quarter horizon can look like an opportunity over a five-year one.


Managing Risk Is a Discipline, Not a Reaction


None of this is about predicting the next downturn correctly — nobody does that consistently. What experienced executives actually do is build in enough liquidity, diversification, downside protection, and time-horizon flexibility that being wrong about timing doesn't become catastrophic. That's the real skill — not forecasting uncertainty away, but building something that doesn't require certainty to survive it.


Sources

[1] Federal Reserve, Review of the Federal Reserve's Supervision and Regulation of Silicon Valley Bank, April 2023.

[2] BlackRock, 2025 Global Family Office Survey.

[3] Goldman Sachs / Stallion Capital analysis of Goldman Sachs' 2025 Family Office Investment Insights Report.

Comments


bottom of page